Current:Home > Contact-usSpecial counsel Jack Smith argues Judge Tanya Chutkan shouldn't recuse herself in Trump case-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Special counsel Jack Smith argues Judge Tanya Chutkan shouldn't recuse herself in Trump case
View Date:2024-12-23 21:58:15
Washington — Special counsel Jack Smith filed a blistering motion in response to former President Donald Trump's request that the judge overseeing his federal 2020 election interference criminal case recuse herself.
"There is no valid basis, under the relevant law and facts, for the Honorable Tanya S. Chutkan, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, to disqualify herself in this proceeding," Smith wrote in a 20-page filing an hour before a deadline set by Chutkan to respond.
- Trump's 4 indictments in detail: A quick-look guide to charges, trial dates and key players for each case
He said that in seeking Chutkan's recusal, Trump "both takes out of context the Court's words from prior judicial proceedings and misstates the proper legal standards governing judicial recusals."
Smith also argued that Trump "cherry-picks" from two of Chutkan's sentencing hearings for two Capitol riot defendants, and in both cases, "the Court was appropriately responding to—and ultimately rejecting— a common argument raised by scores of January 6 offenders: that they deserved leniency because their actions were inspired by, or were not as serious as, those of others who contributed to the riot but had not been held responsible—including former president Donald J. Trump, the defendant in this case."
Trump's lawyers asked in a filing Monday that Chutkan remove herself from the case because of previous statements she had made in two separate Capitol riot sentencing hearings.
"Judge Chutkan has, in connection with other cases, suggested that President Trump should be prosecuted and imprisoned," Trump's lawyers wrote in their request. "Such statements, made before this case began and without due process, are inherently disqualifying."
They highlighted statements she made about the former president, including telling one Capitol riot defendant in October 2022 that the violent attempt to overthrow the government came from "blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day."
"The public meaning of this statement is inescapable — President Trump is free, but should not be," Trump's attorneys wrote.
But in his filing, Smith provided more extensive transcripts of the remarks Judge Chutkan had made in the two Capitol riot sentencing hearings to make the argument that the full transcripts show that she "did not state that [Trump] was legally or morally culpable for the events of January 6 or that he deserved punishment," but rather, that "the Court was engaged in its judicial responsibility to hear, acknowledge, and respond to [the Jan. 6 defendant's] sentencing allocution."
Addressing the emphasis placed by Trump's recusal motion on this phrase, "it's a blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day," Smith wrote, "From this simple statement of uncontroverted fact, the defendant purports to draw the 'inescapable' message that the Court believes that defendant Trump should be imprisoned. But the only inescapable thing about the Court's comment is that it stated an uncontested and accurate fact in response to a mitigation argument that the Court had heard many times before."
Smith argued Trump has not proven Chutkan made biased claims because he "must show that they display a deep-seated animosity toward him."
"The defendant cannot meet this heavy burden," Smith wrote.
"Because the defendant cannot point to any statements expressing actual bias, all he can say—and he says it repeatedly—is that the Court's comments 'suggest' some sort of bias or prejudice toward the defendant," Smith added.
Ultimately, it is up to Chutkan to decide whether her past statements create the perception of bias. A new judge would be assigned to the case if she recuses. Trump's attorneys could petition an appeals court to require her to recuse, but such efforts are often not successful.
Trump will be able to respond to Smith's counter-argument, and his deadline to do so is next week.
Fin Gomez and Graham Kates contributed to this report.
- In:
- Donald Trump
- United States Department of Justice
- Jack Smith
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter for CBS News Digital. Reach her at [email protected]. Follow her on Twitter: https://twitter.com/hausofcait
TwitterveryGood! (88)
Related
- The 15 quickest pickup trucks MotorTrend has ever tested
- Cheers Your Cosmos to the Most Fabulous Sex and the City Gift Guide
- Transcript: National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan on Face the Nation, July 16, 2023
- Shopify deleted 322,000 hours of meetings. Should the rest of us be jealous?
- 32-year-old Maryland woman dies after golf cart accident
- This $23 Travel Cosmetics Organizer Has 37,500+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews
- Adam Sandler’s Sweet Anniversary Tribute to Wife Jackie Proves 20 Years Is Better Than 50 First Dates
- Warming Trends: The BBC Introduces ‘Life at 50 Degrees,’ Helping African Farmers Resist Drought and Driftwood Provides Clues to Climate’s Past
- Fantasy football waiver wire: 10 players to add for NFL Week 11
- Missing Sub Passenger Stockton Rush's Titanic Connection Will Give You Chills
Ranking
- Man killed by police in Minnesota was being sought in death of his pregnant wife
- Missing Sub Passenger Stockton Rush's Titanic Connection Will Give You Chills
- In a New Policy Statement, the Nation’s Physicists Toughen Their Stance on Climate Change, Stressing Its Reality and Urgency
- Q&A: With Climate Change-Fueled Hurricanes and Wildfire on the Horizon, a Trauma Expert Offers Ways to Protect Your Mental Health
- Former Disney Star Skai Jackson Is Pregnant, Expecting First Baby With Her Boyfriend
- Trump asks 2 more courts to quash Georgia special grand jury report
- An Offshore Wind Farm on Lake Erie Moves Closer to Reality, but Will It Ever Be Built?
- 13 Refineries Emit Dangerous Benzene Emissions That Exceed the EPA’s ‘Action Level,’ a Study Finds
Recommendation
-
These Yellowstone Gift Guide Picks Will Make You Feel Like You’re on the Dutton Ranch
-
Incursions Into Indigenous Lands Not Only Threaten Tribal Food Systems, But the Planet’s Well-Being
-
Republicans Seize the ‘Major Questions Doctrine’ to Block Biden’s Climate Agenda
-
Soccer Star Neymar Pens Public Apology to Pregnant Girlfriend Bruna Biancardi for His “Mistakes
-
What does the top five look like and other questions facing the College Football Playoff committee
-
The Climate Solution Actually Adding Millions of Tons of CO2 Into the Atmosphere
-
The TVA’s Slower Pace Toward Renewable Energy Weakens Nashville’s Future
-
As the US Rushes After the Minerals for the Energy Transition, a 150-Year-Old Law Allows Mining Companies Free Rein on Public Lands